Value stream mapping for multiple working groups

Value stream mapping for multiple working groups
Slide 1 of 2

or

Favourites Favourites

Try Before you Buy Download Free Sample Product

Audience Impress Your
Audience
Editable 100%
Editable
Time Save Hours
of Time
The Biggest Sale is ending soon in
0
0
:
0
0
:
0
0
Presenting this set of slides with name Value Stream Mapping For Multiple Working Groups. The topics discussed in these slides are Process Start, Timeline, Process End. This is a completely editable PowerPoint presentation and is available for immediate download. Download now and impress your audience.

People who downloaded this PowerPoint presentation also viewed the following :

FAQs for Value stream mapping for

So basically you're mapping out your whole process from start to finish - every single step, handoff, all the waiting around. Think of it like getting X-ray vision for where things get stuck or wasted. You'll see exactly where value actually happens versus where stuff just sits there collecting dust between departments. Honestly, most people are shocked when they see how much time gets wasted on handoffs alone. Once you've got that big picture laid out, you can figure out which improvements will actually move the needle and build a realistic plan to fix things.

So basically when you map out every step in your process, all the waste becomes super obvious. Like you'll suddenly notice inventory just sitting there for weeks, or people stuck waiting for some random approval that takes forever. The visual aspect is what really gets you - seeing all those handoffs and redundant steps laid out makes you go "why are we even doing this?" I'd start with just one product line and trace it from beginning to end. Then ask yourself what actually adds value for the customer vs what's just... there. Honestly the bottlenecks become pretty clear once it's all on paper.

So for your VSM, you'll need customer demand/takt time first. Then map out each process step with cycle times and lead times. Don't skip the inventory levels sitting between processes - that's where stuff gets stuck. Information flows are huge too, showing how work actually gets triggered. The timeline at the bottom is honestly my favorite part - you can see your total lead time versus actual value-add time, which is usually pretty eye-opening. Grab quality metrics, changeover times, and batch sizes for each step while you're at it. Both material AND information flows matter here. Start with sticky notes on a wall before you get all fancy with software.

So basically, current state is like taking a photo of your messy process right now - all the delays, bottlenecks, the stuff that drives everyone crazy. Future state? That's your dream version after you fix things. Current state = reality check. You're measuring actual cycle times and documenting where things get stuck. Future state = redesign mode. You've spotted the waste and now you're mapping out something way better. Oh, and definitely do current state first - you can't improve what you don't understand. Trust me on this one.

Honestly, just grab a whiteboard and some sticky notes first - that's what we did and it worked fine. Most teams go digital pretty quick though. Lucidchart's probably your best bet since it has all the VSM templates already built in. Visio works too but it's kinda clunky if I'm being honest. There are specialized tools like ValueStreamGuru if you get really into it, or Miro if your team's already using that for other stuff. Don't overthink it - start with whatever you already have access to and see how it goes.

Honestly, skip the theory sessions and just dive into mapping a real process together. Get your experienced people working alongside the newbies on actual projects - way more effective than sitting through presentations. You'll probably want an outside facilitator at first (trust me, internal politics get messy). Mix up your teams with people from different departments since that's where VSM really pays off. The whole thing's about practice though - have them tackle several processes over a few weeks. Don't stress if the first attempts are rough; you're building that instinct for spotting waste and understanding flow.

Don't try mapping everything at once - that's a recipe for getting stuck forever. Seriously, I've watched teams waste weeks perfecting their current state map instead of actually improving anything. Get the people who do the real work involved, otherwise your map will be completely useless. Start with one product family and focus on the big value-adding steps plus obvious waste. Skip the tiny details that won't change flow anyway. The whole point is making real changes happen, not creating some beautiful document that sits in a drawer. Keep it simple and actually use it.

VSM is honestly the best starting point - it connects to basically everything else in lean. The current state map shows you exactly where waste is hiding, then your future state becomes the roadmap for which tools to use where. Like, you'll spot perfect places for 5S or see bottlenecks screaming for kaizen events. Way better than just throwing darts at improvement projects (been there, done that). Once you map it out, standardized work opportunities become super obvious too. Start there first, then let the map tell you what tools to deploy next. Makes the whole thing way less overwhelming.

Customer feedback basically tells you what actually adds value instead of just guessing. Use it to figure out which steps customers care about vs the stuff that's just wasting time. I see companies skip this all the time and wonder why their improvements don't stick. Without customer input, you're mapping what you think matters, not what's real. Grab some recent surveys or feedback before you start - seriously changes how you look at each process step. Makes the whole exercise way more useful.

Honestly, getting everyone physically together for VSM is a game changer. Each person finally sees how their work affects the next team down the line. Marketing suddenly gets why engineering is always asking for requirements so early, you know? And ops starts understanding those crazy sales timelines. The whole visual thing makes it way easier to spot where stuff gets stuck. I'd definitely try giving each department different colored sticky notes next time - makes it super clear who owns what part of the mess. It's wild how much clearer everything becomes when you're all staring at the same map instead of working in your own little bubbles.

Honestly, digital VSM blows the old sticky note approach out of the water. You can pull real data straight from your systems instead of just winging it with estimates. The collaboration aspect is huge too - your whole team can jump on the same map simultaneously and make changes on the fly. What's really cool is running "what if" scenarios before you actually change anything. I'd start simple though, maybe just basic mapping software at first. Once everyone's comfortable (and stops complaining about learning new tech), then you can add the fancy automation stuff that syncs with your existing systems.

Yeah, so product flow variations totally screw up your VSM because the map only shows one slice of what's actually happening. Your current state might look great, but then seasonal demand hits or routing changes and suddenly it's useless. I've seen this mess up so many projects - people map their "normal" flow and miss the real bottlenecks that only show up during peak times or weird batching scenarios. Best bet? Either map your biggest volume flow first (the boring but predictable stuff) or create separate maps for different scenarios. Otherwise you're just mapping fantasy land.

Track your key metrics from the future state map - lead time, cycle time, process time. Those are the big ones. Quality stuff matters too like defect rates and rework percentages. Honestly, resource utilization is usually where things get messy so keep an eye on that. Customer satisfaction scores are what really count at the end of the day though. I'd set up a basic dashboard and check it weekly - you don't want things sliding backward without noticing. Nothing beats seeing those numbers actually improve over time!

Totally works for services! Instead of tracking physical stuff, you're following information and customer touchpoints. Healthcare teams map patient journeys from check-in to discharge. Software folks trace code from idea to launch. Banking does loan approvals - honestly, financial services are goldmines for this kind of thing. You're basically following data, documents, and customer interactions instead of products on a conveyor belt. My advice? Pick whichever service process annoys your customers most. That's where you'll find the low-hanging fruit. Start there and you'll spot improvement opportunities pretty quickly.

You should definitely look at Toyota - they basically created VSM and used it to kill waste in their factories, which is how they became such a quality powerhouse. Ford's another great one, cutting their order-to-delivery from weeks down to just days. Boeing streamlined their 737 assembly and saved tons of production time too. What's wild is even banks started using it to speed up loan processing. These weren't small wins either - we're talking major efficiency gains that customers actually noticed. Honestly, just map out one simple process you deal with and the bottlenecks will jump out at you immediately.

Ratings and Reviews

0% of 100
Review Form
Write a review
Most Relevant Reviews

No Reviews